at Jaw time
him whether what conclusions
he has drawn from replies to Circular
sent to d. S. B. in of 25 Jan. 90
un letter of 29 Oct. 90 [m24197/09]
t whether we should Encourage any of the (olies [8.9. Straits,
imiter
this Haughing
Yes. So Juven atoma M.$);
Strait I to follow 17756/90)
example
Dr Buchanan
Pag gup now.
4
ध्
4. Nov.
qu Please see the above muites. Have gun
observations to offer? Shall we
arey receive
any
official reply
to the letter
to Local fovernment Board of 27 Oct. 1890 ?
Genze & Johnsm деще
?
7 Nov. 1891
from the acornfe.comgang
analysis
Ihan
reas
Lief
13038
It will be
Lat
information about temple from the 2.1.5. has bem cobtained, and that such information as is given leads to very differend rabamentary
of the beacfile as used by
by another vacinator.
Cartanoly I think the colonies should be Encouraged to
coftivate legeefple for transitions. Tom what I read in somn
in the case of snow colorges up beats
for seferring coltivation of papers then would sean nason for preferring
j
animal Geuth.
Sear
previous winate on
5. Afeien file.
Hy
Reply from the Board would. I pure, consist only Eventing letter netwosing the perfors with suferous to the commuter made
can be sout back to me for such,
Ther
If desired, the hajun
221
21363
REC
Pect 3 NOV 91
quiad
No 321
24197
The papers.
chand
with on
were returned to Dr
& matter was
My Lord,
Government House,
Hongkong, 303 September 1891.
I regret to have
to inform Your Lordship. that I find that Your Lordship's sanction has not been obtained for
The Right Honourable
Lord Knutsford, GemG,
Да
fe
a
new
Publie
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.